LGOIMA Requests
Refine Search
Search results: 617
Received | Subject | Status | |
---|---|---|---|
07/06/2022 | Ombudsman Complaint - Information not released for LG2001 | Complete | Details |
30/05/2022 | A complete overview of the proposed stopping of Opawe Road | null | Details |
28/05/2022 | Request for shape files for the Dog Exercise Areas and Dog Prohibition Areas in your online mapping tool | Complete | Details |
05/05/2022 | Council position on 3 Waters and membership of Communities 4 Local Democracy | Complete | Details |
02/05/2022 | Details of infringement notices for stationary vehicles | Complete | Details |
02/05/2022 | What consultation did the Council undertake before joining the "Communities 4 Local Democracy" organisation? | Complete | Details |
02/05/2022 | Processing details for Building consents and Resource consents and total staff turnover for Council in last financial year | Complete | Details |
20/04/2022 | Building consent information 2019 - 2021 | Complete | Details |
20/04/2022 | Further information about Waste Management and Minimisation Plan | Complete | Details |
19/04/2022 | Climate change and biodiversity loss | Complete | Details |
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2077
Date received: 07/06/2022
Requested information: Ombudsman Complaint - Information not released for LG2001
Status: Complete
Date responded: 30/06/2022
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2106
Date received: 30/05/2022
Requested information: A complete overview of the proposed stopping of Opawe Road
Status: null
Date responded: 07/09/2022
Response:
I refer to your official information request dated 30 May 2022. Firstly, let me apologise for the length of time it has taken to get this response to you.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2082
Date received: 28/05/2022
Requested information: Request for shape files for the Dog Exercise Areas and Dog Prohibition Areas in your online mapping tool
Status: Complete
Date responded: 22/06/2022
Attachments:
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2074
Date received: 05/05/2022
Requested information: Council position on 3 Waters and membership of Communities 4 Local Democracy
Status: Complete
Date responded: 13/05/2022
Response:
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2071
Date received: 02/05/2022
Requested information: Details of infringement notices for stationary vehicles
Status: Complete
Date responded: 05/05/2022
Response:
Hello Tim,
Official information request for Details of infringement notices for stationary vehicles
I refer to your official information request dated 20 April 2022.
The Manawatu District Council has not adopted parking restrictions in our Bylaws and therefore has not issued any infringements relating to the offences you have stated.
If you wish to discuss this with us, please feel free to contact the LGOIMA Response Team on 06 323 0000 or by reply to this email.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2072
Date received: 02/05/2022
Requested information: What consultation did the Council undertake before joining the "Communities 4 Local Democracy" organisation?
Status: Complete
Date responded: 16/05/2022
Response:
Our Council has been instrumental in the forming and running of the Communities 4 Local Democracy group since its inception, with our Mayor being the Chair of the group.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2073
Date received: 02/05/2022
Requested information: Processing details for Building consents and Resource consents and total staff turnover for Council in last financial year
Status: Complete
Date responded: 12/05/2022
Response:
Good morning Jack,
I refer to your official information request received 02 May 2022.
The information you have requested is below, answers in blue.
- In the last financial year, what percent of building consents are processed within statutory timeframe?
In the 2020/2021 financial year 95% of building consents were processed within the statutory timeframe.
- In the last financial year, what percent of resource consents are processed within the statutory timeframe?
- In the last financial year, what was the Median charge per non-notified consent?
- In the last financial year, what was the Median charge per notified consent?
In the 2020/2021 financial year there were no notified resource consents approved.
The median cost of a non-notified resource consent was $1626.75
- In the last financial year, what was the total staff turnover for the council?
In the 2020/2021 financial year the total staff turnover for the council was 27%
Please feel free to contact the LGOIMA Response Team on 06 323 0000 or by replying to this email.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2069
Date received: 20/04/2022
Requested information: Building consent information 2019 - 2021
Status: Complete
Date responded: 26/04/2022
Response:
For the financial year ending 2020/21:
1) How many building consents applications did you receive? 747
2) How many building consents did you issue? 653
3) What was the average building consent timeframes (in days) from the day of application to when consents were issued? 13 working days
4) How many building consents were issued within the 20 working day timeframe? 710
5) How many building consents where not issued within the 20 working day timeframe? 37
6) What were your shortest and longest consent times? 1 and 44 working days
For the financial year ending 2019/20:
7) How many building consents applications did you receive? 662
8) How many building consents did you issue? 647
9) What was the average building consent timeframes (in days) from the day of application to when consent was issued? 13 working days
10) How many building consents were issued within the 20 working day timeframe? 609
11) How many building consents where not issued within the 20 working day timeframe? 38
12) What were your shortest and longest consent times? 1 and 102 working days
General questions:
13) How many people do you have employed that process building consent applications?
The service is delivered via a contractual arrangement with the Palmerston North City Council. There are 4 processing officers, 2 processing and inspection officers and 3 inspection officers.
14) What is the 100% salary pay band for an officer that processes building consents at your council?
MDC cannot comment as we do not directly employ the staff.
15) Thinking about you building consent process, how many assessment checks are required?
Building technical, engineering review (if required), plumbing and drainage, planning, Infrastructure, Health (if required) and FENZ (if required).
16) Thinking about you building consent process, how many assessment checks do not require a human to assess this because it is automated? None
17) Can you submit building consent drawings via your website? Our website provides a link to an on line application portal.
18) Does your Council gather formal feedback from building consent applicants through a survey? if so, please send a copy of the results. No
19) In the financial period 2020/21, what was the economic value of the construction industry in your territorial authority? $88,078,055
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2070
Date received: 20/04/2022
Requested information: Further information about Waste Management and Minimisation Plan
Status: Complete
Date responded: 28/04/2022
Response:
Could you please tell us who wrote each of the 3 consultation documents?
The three documents released for consultation were the Waste Assessment 2022, the draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan 2022 – 2028 (WMMP), and the Statement of Intent. All three documents were prepared internally by a Project Team of Council Officers, which included technical experts, strategy and policy advisors, and management. Each of the three documents were then approved by Council to be released for consultation with the community.
Could you please give us a detailed outline of the budget for waste management and minimisation. We're interested in the overall budget, and in particular the amount of money committed to waste minimisation.
Please see LGOIMA Attachment 1 – 10 Year Plan 2021-31 budget for the Waste Minimisation cost centre.
Could you give us a detailed breakdown on how the funds from the Waste Management levy have been spent over the 2016 - 22 period. When we met with you Sue had seen a LGOIMA request that showed that the only funding spent was on the education programme by Para Kore. But we are now assuming that information was out of date as it seems this funding has also been spent on other projects. What happens to any unspent levy? Is it carried forward into future years? Can you please tell us what the allocation is for the current year (plus any funds available from previous years, if they are able to be carried forward).
The table below shows the Waste Minimisation Levy that Council received, and what was spent from 2009/10 to 2019/20.
Waste Minimisation Levy | | | |
. | Revenue | Expenditure | Surplus |
2009/10 | 88076 | 0 | 88076 |
2010/11 | 42293 | 0 | 42293 |
2011/12 | 83439 | 5000 | 78439 |
2012/13 | 84623 | 28784 | 55839 |
2013/14 | 89777 | 33347 | 56430 |
2014/15 | 95207 | 55016 | 40191 |
2015/16 | 105271 | 73115 | 32156 |
2016/17 | 110560 | 71322 | 39238 |
2017/18 | 112759 | 51636 | 61123 |
2018/19 | 116990 | 55503 | 61487 |
2019/20 | 110200 | 85549 | 24651 |
Total | 1039195 | 459272 | 579923 |
Unspent Waste Minimisation Levy funding is accumulated if it is unspent, and remains with Council. However, regular reporting is required to the Ministry of Environment who expect to see a plan of how Council will utilise these accumulated funds. The final WMMP will therefore contain where the waste levy will be spent on actions for improving Waste Management and Minimisation over the next 6 years.
Please see LGOIMA Attachment 2 – Waste Levy expenditure report – 2009 – 2021 for a detailed breakdown of how the Waste Management Levy has been spent over the 2016 – 2022 period.
We are also wondering why are there no diversion rates recorded in the current draft plan, except the marae involved with the Para kore programme? We think having measurable targets is crucial to making progress, and also to helping the public to engage and to be able to feel they're 'making a difference' through what they do.
The Objectives and Targets included in the draft WMMP are as set out in Council's 10 Year Plan 2021 – 31. The draft WMMP states that Council will review the Objectives and Targets set out below in the next 10 Year Plan in response to the direction set by the WMMP.
At the time of setting revised Objectives and Targets, Council will consider the appropriateness of including a diversion rate as a measure. There are complexities with accurately and realistically calculating a diversion rate measure/target, and increasing data collection as outlined within the action plan within the draft WMMP will assist with this kind of reporting.
We are strongly supportive of the idea of a dedicated role, as mentioned on p.41 (last item) of the Waste Assessment document. Can you give us any information on the thinking and work done so far on this, please. Also can you tell us the reason/s as to why it hasn't been included in the draft WMMP ?
The Waste Assessment 2022 provides a long list of possible actions that could help to address issues highlighted within. As you have raised, one of those possibilities was creation of a dedicated role within Council for Waste Management and Minimisation.
When considering this long list of potential options and forming the Action Plan within the draft WMMP, many different considerations were made including the cost of an additional staff member, the capacity of existing staff members, and the source of funding required for additional FTE. The action was not included within the draft WMMP after these considerations were made - largely due to existing staff capacity within Council to fulfil waste management and minimisation functions.
Can you give us any indication of what got in the way of progress re the farm waste / agri-waste. Is it simply a matter of insufficient resourcing and the fact that there isn't a dedicated role for dealing with this. Can you tell us what 'existing activities' re farm plastics are occurring , or any other existing activities with the farming community.
As outlined within the draft WMMP, the off farm waste disposal initiative from the WMMP 2016 was explored, but further work is required on implementation planning involving the private Agri-Waste industry.
Included in the action plan within the draft WMMP is for Council to partner with private industry on community collection events for farm waste. We look forward to building our relationships with the Agri-waste sector on this action.
Strengthening the partnership between Council and private industry on these events would help to advertise the availability of existing circular farm waste opportunities in the district and allow Council to play a greater role in managing and minimising farm waste. More information on existing farm waste initiatives in the district can be found on page 24 of the Waste Assessment 2022.
LGOIMA Request Details: LG2068
Date received: 19/04/2022
Requested information: Climate change and biodiversity loss
Status: Complete
Date responded: 13/05/2022
Response:
The information you have requested is below.
1. Manawatū District Council is developing its environmental sustainability strategy. This strategy will be made up of two parts. A corporate strategic action plan with a focus on measuring and reducing GHG emissions within the organisation, and a community action plan which will focus on partnering with the community more broadly on environmental challenges and initiatives.
2. There is an implementation plan for the corporate action plan.
3. Actions 2-4 of the corporate strategic action plan relate to measuring council's carbon emissions, setting targets for reduction, then monitoring, mitigation and reporting on emissions. Council has partnered with an energy management company to measure and monitor council's emissions. Council will track emissions activity via the energy company's monitoring dashboard
4. No, this is the responsibility of regional councils
5. No, as above
6. The Regional Policy Statement (One Plan) establishes Horizons as the lead agency in the region to control activities in specified habitats and to work with land owners to protect and enhance these habitats. Under the One Plan, the Manawatū District Council is responsible for notable and amenity trees, but not for indigenous biodiversity generally.
That said, the Operative District Plan (2002) includes provisions (Chapter 4: Heritage) and associated schedules for:
* Wetlands, Lakes, Rivers and their Margins (Appendix 1a), and
* Significant Areas Of Indigenous Forest/Vegetation (excluding reserves) (appendix 1b)
Some areas included in the schedules have rules while others are included for information purposes only, the list is available via the link on the council website:
https://www.mdc.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/11266/Appendix-1-Gen-1-PC51-operative-PC65-legal-effect.pdf
Council is working on a District Plan Review and these areas/provisions will be reviewed in line with the Regional Policy Statement.
7. Areas identified in the schedules are also included on the District Plan maps.
8. The work to review and identify SNA's has yet to be completed, according to the One Plan this is Horizons' responsibility in our region.
9. MDC does not have a fund to manage privately owned areas, council owned areas would be maintained under annual plan funding.
10. Consents data – nil applications received
11. No rules with this purpose exist in the Operative District Plan
12. Regional Council takes the role of monitoring SNA's in the region